
主题题,本文的目的是劝说,即反对了一种观点并论述理由,属于典型的“新老观点对比型”文章
A错误,文章并没有讨论如何解决环境管理问题
B错误,与“不同的遵守等级”无关
C错误,与“不同的替代管理方法”无关
D错误,与“倡导公司遵守环保管制”无关
E正确,“纠正一种误解”非常符合文中意思
题目讨论 (7条评论)

-
Mariposa爱学习
uniformly 一致的 regulatory compliance 法规遵从 unevenly 不均衡的 discretion 自由裁量权
1
0 回复 2020-11-16 16:20:53
-
GMAT的大师兄
A选项:并没有解决一个管理问题也没有提出相应的解决措施 B选项:无关选项 - 说明了不同企业对于环境监管的顺从程度 C选项:无关选项 - 描述了传统环境管理的替代方法 D选项:无关选项 - 提倡企业遵守环境监管 E选项:纠正了一个大众对于环境监管影响的认知偏差
0
0 回复 2020-10-20 16:19:28
-
emily666
Among the myths taken as fact by the environmental managers of most corporations is the belief that environmental regulations affect all competitors in a given industry uniformly. 第一句话就点题了。。
0
0 回复 2020-04-01 17:48:54
-
173125w
"environmental regulations affect all competitors in a given industry not uniformly, regulatory costs - and therefore compliance - fall unevenly, economically disadvantaging some companies and benefiting others." -----widespread environmental management problem "By realizing that they have discretion and that not all industries are affected equally by environmental regulation, environmental managers can help their companies to achieve a competitive edge by anticipating regulatory pressure and exploring all possibilities for addressing how changing regulations will affect their companies specifically." -----suggest possible solutions why A is not correct?
1
0 回复 2019-10-13 15:23:14
-
sjz回复 173125w
The passage did not talk about management problem. It talked about common misconception, and talked management method in last sentence.
0
0 回复 2019-12-24 23:21:00
-
-
浪逐曲奇
错选了D,根据原文最后一句话选的。。。。
0
0 回复 2019-09-15 20:03:50
-
judygogo
本文主要目的在第一句话已经点明,先state了一个misconception 然后用 in reality 反转 说明自己并不认同这个观点 然后用一些连接词 诸如Additionally finally 来验证自己的不认同
0
0 回复 2017-11-23 10:11:14
-
默默回复judygogo
in reality 表示转折人们错误观点
0
0 回复 2018-05-17 11:27:21
-
默默回复judygogo
第一段论点内容
0
0 回复 2018-05-17 11:27:31
-
-
jasmine0206
B为啥不对?确实是说了大公司、小公司、使用旧生产技术的公司、这样好几种不同公司的不同遵守的水平啊?
0
0 回复 2017-07-20 16:57:23
-
KK立志71党回复jasmine0206
主要的purpose并不是说明几个不同level的compliance啊,这些“for example,addition,finally”都是为了例子为了推翻misconception
0
0 回复 2017-07-31 14:50:04
-