建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目
【OG20-P813-901题】
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

“,saying” 做伴随状语,其中compliance是主语。当前版本由 艾垣汐爱吃萝卜 更新于2017-10-08 15:47:41 感谢由 艾垣汐爱吃萝卜 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
A.protect错误,compliance不可数,protect应该用单数,排除。
B.Is protecting正确。
C. protect错误,compliance不可数,protect应该用单数,排除。
D.are protecting错误,应该用单数形式,排除。
E.requiring 作为后置定语修饰compliance with laws,不能用to require,排除。
如果把A中的protect改为protects,A是不是就对了呢?求解答当前版本由 艾垣汐爱吃萝卜 更新于2017-10-08 15:46:03 感谢由 艾垣汐爱吃萝卜 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
"require" can also be used simply with a direct object, as in当前版本由 艾垣汐爱吃萝卜 更新于2017-10-08 15:42:21 感谢由 艾垣汐爱吃萝卜 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
i require perfection.
this device requires four AA batteries.
these are perfectly good sentences.
--
(b) is the correct answer. it uses "require" with a direct object, as discussed above, and it also correctly uses the singular verb "is" with the singular subject "compliance". (we know "compliance" is the subject, because "with ..." is a prepositional phrase that serves only as a modifier of that subject.)
--
(c)
"protect" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance".
--
(d)
"are" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance".
--
(d) and (e)
"laws to require..." isn't a correct idiom if you're discussing the actual text of the laws themselves. if you were discussing the ultimate purpose of those laws, then this could be idiomatic.
examples:
laws specifying long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> correct (___ing), since that's what the laws actually specify.
laws to specify long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> incorrect (that's not the ultimate purpose of the laws)
laws to discourage drunk driving --> correct (this IS actually the ultimate purpose of the laws)
曼哈顿里有
These verbs take either the command subjuctive or the infinitive :ask;beg;intend; order;prefer;urge;require;
不知道A是怎么错了
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
啦啦啦啦噜
make
0
0 回复 2021-01-13 16:04:54
-
224048l
sth. require that +虚拟(do) 不行吗
0
0 回复 2020-11-03 23:05:08
-
229715zw回复224048l
应该用protects
0
0 回复 2020-11-22 13:23:17
-
-
Balala
their compliance 说明要单数形式 排出ACD to require表目的 不符合语义 排除E
0
0 回复 2020-07-02 09:38:07
-
zzzyyr
requiring 引导同位语从句修饰compliance,compliance is sth
0
0 回复 2019-11-29 10:06:30
-
zzzyyr回复zzzyyr
law
0
0 回复 2019-11-29 10:07:25
-
yolanda8回复zzzyyr
引导定语从句修饰laws
0
0 回复 2020-04-21 10:14:13
-
-
夏夏夏筱染
做题到现在,自己却一直忽略主谓一致这个基本考点。要被自己气死了
1
0 回复 2019-09-05 15:24:35
-
dGee回复夏夏夏筱染
偶尔我也是,真想锤死自己
0
0 回复 2019-09-06 14:54:37
-
-
夏夏夏筱染
摘自曼哈顿ron: (b) is the correct answer. it uses "require" with a direct object, as discussed above, and it also correctly uses the singular verb "is" with the singular subject "compliance". (we know "compliance" is the subject, because "with ..." is a prepositional phrase that serves only as a modifier of that subject.) -- (c) "protect" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance". -- (d) "are" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance". -- (d) and (e) "laws to require..." isn't a correct idiom if you're discussing the actual text of the laws themselves. if you were discussing the ultimate purpose of those laws, then this could be idiomatic. examples: laws specifying long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> correct (___ing), since that's what the laws actually specify. laws to specify long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> incorrect (that's not the ultimate purpose of the laws) laws to discourage drunk driving --> correct (this IS actually the ultimate purpose of the laws)
3
0 回复 2019-09-05 15:19:08
-
Jennysolarenergy回复夏夏夏筱染
请问哪里能看到ron的回答呢?一直找不到,谢谢
0
0 回复 2019-11-24 15:22:53
-
1289311ww回复夏夏夏筱染
你翻墙就可以看到了
1
0 回复 2019-12-28 15:08:49
-
-
Kath1230
saying that [their compliance] with laws 从句的主语是their compliance是单数,后面谓语动词要用单数 law后面一半跟doing
0
0 回复 2019-02-10 01:19:02
-
HoggieT
说compliance是从句主语的,脑子坏掉了吧?
0
2 回复 2018-11-11 14:22:31
-
逸文要去麻省回复HoggieT
看来看去,都觉得compliance就是从句主语啊,哪里不对? 你觉得从句主语是啥呢
0
0 回复 2019-01-23 14:02:15
-
小馄吞回复HoggieT
原来RON脑子坏掉了 we know "compliance" is the subject, because "with ..." is a prepositional phrase that serves only as a modifier of that subject.
0
2 回复 2019-10-13 21:22:22
-
-
发呆的夜之亡魂
A,protect和compliance主谓不一致;C,同A;D,are protecting和compliance主谓不一致;E,表目的因为法律不是只有一个目的。法律法规之后要求用doing, 表示反复使用,从句的话表示一次性
0
0 回复 2018-07-02 11:13:48
-
默默
compliance是从句部分的主语
0
0 回复 2018-04-13 02:28:56
-
默默回复默默
反复,一直在做的动作
0
0 回复 2018-04-13 03:28:07
-