【OG20-P813-901题】Last week local shrimpers held a news conference t_OG16

雷哥网GMAT>题库>OG16>句子改错SC >8754

句子改错SC-8754 【难度:650-680】 Time Cost00:00

报告题目错误

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目

【OG20-P813-901题】

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A

requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

B

requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C

that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

D

to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

E

to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

该题平均耗时：3m8s ，平均正确率：56.8%。该题由网友Otp63MZ提供。更多GMAT题目请

网友解析

暂无雷哥网文字解析

预约讲师一对一题目解析课程

当前版本由吃着香蕉开跑车更新于2021-05-21 16:37:40 感谢由吃着香蕉开跑车对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

选B
saying that宾从的主语是compliance，ACD选项，主谓单复数不一致。E选项，to require做后置定语修饰laws语义不合理，根据语义这个法律已经在实施中了，所以不用to do不定式修饰。

题目讨论（10条评论）

提交

angelfighting

这句话主语是their compliance，是单数，排除acd。语义上require 修饰compliance，排除e

1 0 回复 2021-08-09 21:31:41
啦啦啦啦噜

make

0 0 回复 2021-01-13 16:04:54
224048l

sth. require that +虚拟(do) 不行吗

0 0 回复 2020-11-03 23:05:08
229715zw回复224048l

应该用protects

0 0 回复 2020-11-22 13:23:17
Balala

their compliance 说明要单数形式排出ACD to require表目的不符合语义排除E

0 0 回复 2020-07-02 09:38:07
zzzyyr

requiring 引导同位语从句修饰compliance，compliance is sth

0 0 回复 2019-11-29 10:06:30
zzzyyr回复zzzyyr

law

0 0 回复 2019-11-29 10:07:25

yolanda8回复zzzyyr

引导定语从句修饰laws

0 0 回复 2020-04-21 10:14:13
夏夏夏筱染

做题到现在，自己却一直忽略主谓一致这个基本考点。要被自己气死了

3 0 回复 2019-09-05 15:24:35
dGee回复夏夏夏筱染

偶尔我也是，真想锤死自己

0 0 回复 2019-09-06 14:54:37

夏夏夏筱染

摘自曼哈顿ron：
(b) is the correct answer. it uses "require" with a direct object, as discussed above, and it also correctly uses the singular verb "is" with the singular subject "compliance". (we know "compliance" is the subject, because "with ..." is a prepositional phrase that serves only as a modifier of that subject.)

--

(c)
"protect" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance".

--

(d)
"are" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance".

--

(d) and (e)
"laws to require..." isn't a correct idiom if you're discussing the actual text of the laws themselves. if you were discussing the ultimate purpose of those laws, then this could be idiomatic.
examples:
laws specifying long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> correct (___ing), since that's what the laws actually specify.
laws to specify long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> incorrect (that's not the ultimate purpose of the laws)
laws to discourage drunk driving --> correct (this IS actually the ultimate purpose of the laws)

0 回复 2019-09-05 15:19:08

Jennysolarenergy回复夏夏夏筱染

请问哪里能看到ron的回答呢？一直找不到，谢谢

0 0 回复 2019-11-24 15:22:53
1289311ww回复夏夏夏筱染

你翻墙就可以看到了

1 0 回复 2019-12-28 15:08:49

Kath1230

saying that [their compliance] with laws 从句的主语是their compliance是单数，后面谓语动词要用单数 law后面一半跟doing

0 0 回复 2019-02-10 01:19:02
HoggieT

说compliance是从句主语的，脑子坏掉了吧？

1 2 回复 2018-11-11 14:22:31
逸文要去麻省回复HoggieT

看来看去，都觉得compliance就是从句主语啊，哪里不对？你觉得从句主语是啥呢

0 0 回复 2019-01-23 14:02:15

小馄吞回复HoggieT

原来RON脑子坏掉了 we know "compliance" is the subject, because "with ..." is a prepositional phrase that serves only as a modifier of that subject.

0 2 回复 2019-10-13 21:22:22
发呆的夜之亡魂

A，protect和compliance主谓不一致；C，同A；D，are protecting和compliance主谓不一致；E，表目的因为法律不是只有一个目的。法律法规之后要求用doing, 表示反复使用，从句的话表示一次性

0 0 回复 2018-07-02 11:13:48