建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目
【OG20-P808-875题】
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

考点:比较 修饰当前版本由 Loraine 更新于2020-11-11 11:23:52 感谢由 Loraine 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
分析:比较的对象是wild animals和livestock的fat相比较;they think中的they指代wild animals不合理,要改成被动形式;
选项:
A.they think指代wild animals不合理;
B.正确;
C.that多余,have也可以省略;
D.比较对象是total fat和livestock,不可比;
E.in wild animals和that of livestock不可比;their指代animals不合理;
B. wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of
fat thought to be
这里比较的是wild animals和livestock的本身的性质
C. wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more
fat of a kind thought to be
that指代fat,这里比较的是animals和fat
(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in
这里比较的是protein
when you see a comparison, you need to boil the comparison down to the SINGLE NOUNS/PRONOUNS that are compared. this means, inter alia, that you have to dispense with modifiers, prepositional phrases, and the like - the same irrelevant constructions that go out the window when you consider other types of agreement (like subject-verb agreement).
in the example you've cited, the comparison is between PROTEIN ('in rice' is a modifying prepositional phrase, so it gets chucked) and THAT (which of course refers to protein), and is therefore proper. 比较是在蛋白质(“在米中”是修饰性介词短语,因此它被剔除)和THAT(当然是指蛋白质)之间进行的比较,因此是正确的。
in choice c, the comparison is between ANIMALS and THAT (which in this case stands for FAT). you can't consider livestock to be the second half of the comparison, because it's part of a prepositional phrase (which is a modifier and therefore can't be part of the comparison).
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
JoyceWong
为什么这里比较又不用平行呢 我是因为A的than do livestock才选了
0
0 回复 2021-03-26 08:21:39
-
557322zfwf回复JoyceWong
因为是less total fat, fat和fat比,不是have fat和have fat比
0
0 回复 2021-03-27 22:05:20
-
-
439151boyp
前面说的总的脂肪含量 less total fat,野的比家养的少; more of a kind of fat,但是野的多了一种有益的脂肪
0
0 回复 2020-11-27 18:25:32
-
216648kfag
不太理解more of a kind of fat,求解求解
1
0 回复 2020-02-24 11:35:35
-
376261jglca回复 216648kfag
more和前面less平行 你再带进去试试看
0
0 回复 2020-03-31 16:49:12
-
-
175966wf
a kind of 前面为什么加上了of ,加上了of 对比较有什么影响吗,求解。
2
0 回复 2020-01-31 21:59:31
-
175966wf回复 175966wf
追问,more of a kind of fat是一体的对吗?
0
0 回复 2020-01-31 22:02:25
-
311949guy回复 175966wf
be more of sth 更像是... a kind of 一种 be more of a kind of fat更像是一种脂肪
0
1 回复 2020-03-05 23:56:32
-
-
园园爱吃肉
A原句逻辑语义合理,可是they指代错误不符逻辑;B遵从原句逻辑并且无语法错误;C比较对象不一致;DE改变句子重心,后面还有比较对象和指代的问题(用以验证错误答案,因为根据逻辑就直接排了)
1
0 回复 2019-12-12 18:54:47
-
园园爱吃肉回复园园爱吃肉
主语改变逻辑必变,所以基本上主语变了都不是优选(这道题比较简单,高分体体现得更明显因为根本看不出语法错误
0
0 回复 2019-12-12 18:56:16
-
-
Aletttttta
more of sth(than sth),比起sth,“更像是”sth
0
0 回复 2019-11-03 09:50:17
-
IAMEloise回复Aletttttta
这里应该不是这个意思,就是/更多的 什么什么东西/的意思吧
0
0 回复 2019-12-07 11:14:44
-
-
Nhltz2m
in q24 choice c, the comparison is between ANIMALS and THAT (which in this case stands for FAT). you can't consider livestock to be the second half of the comparison, because it's part of a prepositional phrase (which is a modifier and therefore can't be part of the comparison).
0
0 回复 2019-09-08 00:10:38
-
郑合初
为什么C这里添加了that of 就是错呢,是因为不简洁吗
0
0 回复 2019-08-11 22:51:13
-
抖胖小肉回复郑合初
我觉得这道题B补全: B wild animals have less total fat than livestock (have/do). 或者 fat of wild animal is less than that of livestock. 所以C本来就不应该加that of吧,要是加,应该加have或者do
1
0 回复 2019-08-12 18:58:39
-
Syabe回复郑合初
赞
0
0 回复 2019-09-25 16:11:33
-
-
我是你爸爸的爸爸
当have 是实义动词时 可以省略do
0
0 回复 2019-08-11 08:45:53
-
佛泥
对B有点疑惑的地方在于,but应该链接的是句句子,但是这句局子里明显缺了动词。thought to be是过去分词做修饰的成分,这点理解上我觉得比较困惑
0
0 回复 2019-07-28 12:36:55
-
佛泥回复佛泥
额,我看懂了。动词都是前面的have ; total fat和后面 a kind of fat 是平行的
0
0 回复 2019-07-28 12:38:54
-